Requirements (Beta Version)

PC

Fruition, Enhancement and Protection of Cultural Heritage

PC1

Has the organization implemented initiatives to promote and enhance local identities?

PC2

Has the organization established a permanent documentation center to publicize local identities?

PC3

Has the organization set up a permanent exhibition center to promote local identities?

PC4

Has the organization planned cultural and/or entertainment initiatives that revive or illustrate aspects related to local identities? (temporary exhibitions, reconstructions of environments, historical and work events, etc.)

PC5

Does the organization plan heritage interpretation experiences in the field in direct contact with local identities? (excursions, guided tours, self-managed itineraries, etc.)

PC6

The organization foresees paths of mediated interpretation which sees the use of paper and multimedia tools (panels, cards, flyers, websites, multimedia supports, etc.).

PC7

Has the organisation, in organizing fruition itineraries and cultural events, implemented actions to protect the cultural heritage and the environment involved?

PC8

Has the organization implemented policies and strategies that encourage and facilitate the use of the itineraries and the participation in the initiatives of the residents?

PC9

Does the organization foresee initiatives that see the direct involvement of the community in the activities?

CP

Community and Participation

CP1

Does the organization make available and make it accessible to the community a list where all the actors of the local community involved are defined?

Does the local community involved include the following actors?

CP2

Public institutions?

CP3

Experts, researchers and scholars of the cultural heritage of the territory concerned?

CP4

Entrepreneurs, artisans and businesses in the tourism and cultural sector?

CP5

Cultural and cultural heritage protection associations?

CP6

Residents and other stakeholders?

The type of participation and involvement of the local community includes: 

CP7

Information Sharing.

Note: The information shared may concern decisions that have already been made or decisions that you intend to take. 

CP8

Consultation.

Note: The information is provided in order to gather opinions which will be used by the ecomuseum governance to make decisions.

CP9

Concertation

Note: Information is provided through public debates aimed at the community and the results of the debates are, in substance and/or form, actually used by the ecomuseum's governance to make decisions.

CP10

Codecision

Note: The community participates directly in the final decisions

CP11

Is a community pact present and made public?

CP12

Has a community map been implemented?

CP13

Does the community map include sharing tools, interactivity, or other tools that facilitate dynamic community engagement?

CP14

Public meetings open to community participation are planned and implemented)

CP15

Are there strategies and policies in place to facilitate access to the activities and experiences of interpretation to the local community?

CP16

Are there strategies and policies that stimulate direct participation in the activities and experiences of interpretation by entrepreneurs, craftsmen and businesses in the tourism and cultural sector as well as other interested parties?

SV

Sustainable development of the Territory

Note: The requirements related to Sustainable Quality have been taken into account in the VQCEIP basic scheme

SV1

Are there strategies, policies and activities in the area that lead to new skills or in any case to improve and update existing skills?

SV2

If present, the Ecomuseum Quality Evaluation Unit made up of all the components indicated in the community pact which also evaluates the aspects linked to the sustainable development of the territory?

SV3

Has an analysis been made that takes into account how ecomuseum activities can positively influence the development of the territory?.

SV4

Do the strategies and policies adopted by the Ecomuseum take into account the analyzes carried out in the previous point? 

IS

Institution

IS1

Is there an ecomuseum statute that clearly defines its mission and ecomuseum objectives?

IS2

Is there a regulation that clearly defines the functioning and the relationships between the partners of the ecomuseum?

IS3

Is there an Ecomuseum Quality Evaluation Nucleus made up of all the components indicated in the community pact?

IS4

There is an Ecomuseum Quality Evaluation Nucleus made up of all the members indicated in the community pact

IS5

There is a Technical-Scientific Committee

IS6

Where there is regional legislation for the recognition of ecomuseums, is the institution present in the list of recognized ecomuseums?